Thomas Wictor

Conspiracy, confusion, attention whoring, or politics?

Conspiracy, confusion, attention whoring, or politics?

People tell me that my posts are “conspiracy theories.” No. I write about military deception (MILDEC) and clandestine operations to IMPROVE the world. If I think that several nations are secretly cooperating to destroy the Islamic State, that isn’t a conspiracy theory, since a conspiracy is by definition two or more people agreeing to do something harmful or illegal. Also, I always back up my suppositions with tons of circumstantial evidence.

That’s why I think this piece by Pamela Geller is absolutely reprehensible.

The Third Man

Conspiracy theories bore me. They are an enormous waste of people’s time and energy, particularly now, at a time when conspiracy fact (i.e. the global jihad) is so overwhelming. You don’t need fairy tales when reality is so much more compelling. But something smells rotten in San Bernardino.

Having established her bona fides as someone who doesn’t believe in conspiracy theories, Geller then goes on to spool out one of the dumbest conspiracy theories I’ve ever read.

Like many shocked and horrified Americans, I watched events unfolding in real time. There were, from the very first, three shooters. Eyewitnesses, police scanner broadcasts, news reports all said the same thing.

One eyewitness, Sara[sic] Abdelmageed, gave extensive detail to Scott Pelley on the CBS Evening News. Here’s the exchange: “I heard shots fired and it was from — you know — an automatic weapon,” Abdelmageed said, “we looked out the window a second set of shots goes off…and we saw a man fall to the floor. Then we just looked and we saw three men dressed in all black, military attire, with vests on. They were holding assault rifles. As soon as they opened up the doors to building three one of them started to shoot into the room.”

The eyewitness is named Sally Abdelmageed, not Sara.

Geller then goes on to say this.

Another eyewitness, Juan Hernandez, saw the same thing: three men. He said the shooters were “three white men in military fatigues” who “took off” in a “black Impala or SUV.”

Juan Fernandez saw three men in military fatigues. These are military fatigues.

This is a man dressed all in black, with a ski mask.

Quite a difference, isn’t there? The two eyewitness accounts don’t match.

Juan Fernandez also said that the three men in military fatigues took off in an Impala or an SUV.

This is a Chevrolet Impala.

This is the SUV that Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik used in the attack.

Lawyers say that the worst evidence is an eyewitness account.

Another conspiracy?

Pamela Geller didn’t look at SURVIVOR accounts. There were 100 people at the San Bernardino Public Health Department Christmas party that Farook and Malik shot up. Not one of the 86 survivors says that there were three shooters. On the other hand, there’s this.

Two survivors on opposite sides of the room saw only one shooter. Is this proof of a second conspiracy? Are those actors, not survivors?

What about this discrepancy?

Though Denise [Peraza] says that Farook and Tashfeen were firing randomly, other witnesses claimed they deliberately targeted particular workers, reports Buzzfeed. The couple reportedly pointed their guns at some workers without firing, before allegedly moving on with the slaughter.

Yet another conspiracy? Or is Peraza’s memory hazy from the trauma of BEING SHOT and something else she had to endure?

Her coworker Shannon Johnson, 45, covered her with his body and was killed.

Not one person inside the room saw three shooters. Some saw one and some saw two. Nobody saw three. Another eyewitness account from outside.

A second witness, who asked to remain unnamed, also said she watched from her office window as two people wearing tight-fitting tactical gear walk casually up to the back of the conference room. When she looked up through her window again a man exiting the conference center was walking out just as the two shooters made their way to the back. She caught a glimpse of the rifle as one of them lifted it.

Back to Pamela Geller.

Abdelmageed said that she “couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on — black cargo pants, the kind with the big puffy pockets on the side, long sleeve shirt, gloves, huge assault rifle six magazines I just saw three dressed exactly the same.”

Pelley asked her: “You are certain you saw three men?” Abdelmageed answered: “Yes. It looked like their skin color was white.”

Sally Abdelmageed couldn’t see their faces, arms, or hands, but she somehow determined that their skin color was white. Uh-huh. The shooting took place in Building 3 (red arrow).

The green arrow shows where the shooters entered.

Police went in from the east as well, directly into the conference room.

I can’t figure out where Sally Abdelmageed was, that she could see three men enter the conference room and open fire, and she could see people falling down inside. She also said that she first heard shots; looked out the window; and then saw the three tall, white men in black enter Building 3. To me, her account isn’t believable. It sounds embellished if not entirely made up. How could she see that each “man” carried six magazine of ammunition?

Pamela Geller.

Where is the third man? Is he still at large? Are people at risk? And why was the apartment opened up and the fingerprint evidence destroyed? Why was evidence strewn about?

Something is rotten in the state of California.

Let’s put our cards on the table. Geller is saying that President Obama ordered a “false flag” (brief pause while I projectile vomit) so that he could sign an executive order to take our guns. This is an almost incomprehensibly moronic accusation. It’s like some bizarre Latvian superstition that requires you to eat goose fat and dirt.

If President Obama wanted to take our guns, he’d arrange for another shooting at a black church. They’d have some Manchurian-MKUltra robot-assassin named Cletus Billy Bob Gillespie, he’d be waving the Confederate battle flag, and he’d he’d have a hideous haircut.

President Obama is supposed to BE a Muslim. Why would he order a terrorist attack that plays right into the hands of that Islamic State terrorist Donald Trump?

It’s pretty obscene that the New York Daily News would use Pastor Martin Niemöller’s quote as a way to enable jihadist terrorism, but nothing surprises me anymore. Our popular culture hit bottom a long time ago, and now it’s using excavating equipment.

I’ll try to put this all together.

The gun-grabbing secret Muslim President Obama orders a false flag that makes Muslims look bad, thus creating more support for the Muslim terrorist Donald Trump, who wants to ban Muslims from the US.

As my brother Tim says, the nation is flipping like a big ol’ pancake.

What are people like me supposed to do? I can’t even begin to express my disgust at the endless public displays of self-satisfied mental implosion. Some imbecile on Twitter said that I support gun ownership because I have “penis envy.” That’s perfect. He uses terms without even knowing their definition.

I don’t have penis envy, because I’m not a woman, you worthless blockhead.

Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik carried out the attack of December 2, 2015. There was no third shooter. Despite all their stupid posturing, Farook and Malik were incompetent poseurs whose bombs failed to go off and who fired blindly, in a frenzy.

The couple left behind four spent high-capacity magazines and three pipe bombs as they fled in a rented black Ford Expedition with Utah plates, the sound of sirens approaching.

They used AR-15 rifles.


Each magazine holds thirty rounds.

Four empty magazines means they fired at least 120 bullets. In the photo above, the two magazines on the left are connected “jungle style.” It’s what people who watch too many computer games and movies do so that they can reload quickly. Farook and Malik were wannabes who obviously never practiced marksmanship. We can be very grateful for that.

If President Obama had ordered a false flag, he wouldn’t use “three tall, athletic white men” who fired more than 120 rounds and hit only 35 people. It would’ve been an unimaginable bloodbath perpetrated AGAINST Muslims, black people, gays, Planned Parenthood—anybody but these victims.


Farook and Malik were the only shooters, and they were clowns. Real warriors don’t need to get all tricked out in fancy gear. The Cameroonian BIR was trained by the IDF. They’re currently massacring Boko Haram in Nigeria. No body armor.


Senegal has a secretive Special Forces unit that has been trained by every military on the planet. The US even flew them to Germany for an urban-warfare course. By all accounts they’re incredibly skilled fighters. No body armor.


US Army intelligence personnel attached to the 75th Ranger Regiment in Afghanistan. They’re special-operations capable.

And the undisputed best warriors alive, the British Special Air Service (SAS), fighting in a black T-shirt and no body armor.

We owe it to every member of our armed forces to not become nations of raving, pestilential dunces. Our troops risk their lives to protect us.

Let’s make their sacrifices worthwhile.

This article viewed 896 times.